Wow, your epistemological underpinnings resonate quite clearly, yet the inherent antidisestablishmentarianism saturating your paradigm is truly astounding. Perhaps the dogmatic/didactic presentation would not be as bombastic were it lightened up via the utilization of some words like “Twinkie” and “Ho Ho”. As it is, we are left with a profound sense conundrum and enigma that permeates an otherwise great hypothesis that could gain hegemony throughout the world.
IN OTHER WORDS: YOU ROCK, DON’T EVER CHANGE, YOU DA MAN, YOU DA BOMB!